Justice Justice

I demand justice justice.

No, I don’t have a stutter. What I want is justice for the word “justice” itself.

Because, you see, “justice” has been hijacked by the American left and is now their exclusive weapon. It is no longer a politically neutral word; whenever you see the word “justice” — especially preceded by another noun — it invariably is meant to convey some far-left position.

A History of Crimes Against Justice

The degradation of “justice” started with the phrase “social justice,” a concept which was originally only a religious term but which was later adopted (and re-defined) by the American left to have political connotations. Use of the word “justice” as a leftist buzzword was given a big boost in 1971 with the publication of A Theory of Justice by philosopher John Rawls, which focused on “justice” as the axle around which liberal thought rotated.

Let a Hundred Justices Bloom

In the mid-’70s, the end of the Vietnam War deprived the professional left of its main protest topic, so they cast around for something new to whine about. In the absence of any glaringly urgent crisis, such as a war, they settled on a scattershot array of issues which could be unified under the generalized label “social justice.” Any aspect of American society which was insufficiently leftist suddenly needed a good dose of “social justice” to rectify things.

This overall blanket term was OK for a while, but with the arrival of the new millennium there was a rapid expansion of the “justice” concept. With breathtaking speed, justice-related terms proliferated exponentially in the early 2000s, and within a decade it became nearly impossible to even keep track of all the different “justices” we were expected to achieve.

The trend started with the two justice titans: “economic justice,” and “racial justice.” And someone must have thought: Why stop there? Soon we started seeing demands for “environmental justice” and “reproductive justice.” And then the floodgates were opened. The global warming scare brought us “climate justice“; the drive for socialized medicine became “health care justice“; amnesty for illegals transmogrified into “immigrant justice“; and on and on it went. By now we have

food justice
housing justice
gender justice
workplace justice
farmworker justice
urban justice
media justice
disability justice
transformative justice
birthing justice
prison justice

…to name just a few. Go to any protest or visit a left-wing Web site and you’ll find dozens more “justices” that need immediate resolution.

Want to give your hobby the veneer of righteousness? Just think of a noun, affix the word “justice” after it, and voilà: You’re part of the solution! Yes, it’s that easy.

Language Molestation

In fact, the abuse of “justice” has become so widespread that you can immediately identify the political slant of any group just by looking for the word “justice” in their name or literature; if they prominently feature justice, then they’re left-wing; if they don’t, then they’re not.

Of course, this was part of the plan from the beginning: to use language as a weapon. Find a word that everybody likes, with a universally positive vibe, and then use it relentlessly and ungrammatically as a catch-all euphemism for socialist goals. We want justice, thus we must be the good guys! And any group that isn’t for some kind of justice must therefore be in favor of injustice, and as a result must be the bad guys.

Don’t think for one minute that such linguistic gymnastics are accidental. The left puts an immense amount of effort into branding and framing and public perception. And they’re quite self-congratulatory about the whole process: they invariably think their wordsmithery has worked to shift public opinion leftward.

But of course those of us outside the bubble see that it doesn’t work at all. When you abuse a word like “justice” (or another good example, “rights”), all you succeed in doing is to contaminate the word’s original connotation. So that by now, when average Americans see the word “justice” in a political context, they don’t get a warm and fuzzy feeling like they used to, but instead see a giant flashing neon sign that says “LEFTIST EUPHEMISM.”

Each word only has so much accumulated credibility that you can expend before you drain it dry. Poor old “justice.” By now it has been so misused and molested that it’s not only been drained dry, it’s acquired an entirely new connotation — and not a good one.

Which is exactly why we need a new movement — let’s get justice for justice. The word needs to be saved from the clutches of its abusers and restored to its former glory.

Justice justice now!

14 Responses to “Justice Justice”

  1. 1Ringo the Gringo on Jun 29, 2011 at 8:54 pm:

    “Justice” in the lefty lexicon is essentially another word for “equality” (or should I say, “equality of outcome”)…. Thomas Sowell wrote a great book on the Left and their use of the word “Justice” – check out “The Quest For Cosmic Justice”.

    http://www.amazon.com/Quest-Cosmic-Justice-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0684864630/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1309408438&sr=1-1

    And “Justice” is only one of many words that the Left has turned on it’s head over the years…How about the word “Liberal”, or more recently, “marriage”.

  2. 2Christina on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:17 am:

    For the liberal, “justice” is what “fair” is to elementary school kids, who when they don’t get what they want scream, “It’s not FAIR!”

    But since even a leftist has enough sense to know that screaming “It’s not FAIR!” makes you sound like a kid squabbling with his sister over his turn with the X-Box.

    One envisions Calvin approaching his dad with his clipboard and “poll results”.

  3. 3curious_fritz on Jul 3, 2011 at 1:10 pm:

    Well, I am not quite sure if “social justice” is a term exclusively defined by leftists. At least here in Germany, every party claims to be THE party representing social justice.

    As for your analysis:

    by now, when average Americans see the word “justice” in a political context, they don’t get a warm and fuzzy feeling like they used to, but instead see a giant flashing neon sign that says “LEFTIST EUPHEMISM.”

    I have to say, I do not believe that. Politically informed people maybe might see behind the wordsmithery, but the average American? Don’t get me wrong, I do not share the common German Anti-American stereotypes of the “stupid amis”. But I also have a hard time imagening, that Americans would be so much more intelligent than Germans, who actually fall for all kinds of manipulative language, even after 62 years of democracy and open political discussions.

  4. 4curious_fritz on Jul 3, 2011 at 1:19 pm:

    In addition, you forgot to mention one important form of justice, dance floor justice:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj-CBUvFj48

    Greetings,

    curious_fritz

  5. 5Gork on Jul 3, 2011 at 2:28 pm:

    “If you want Peace, work for Justice.” –commonplace bumper sticker.

    How can you argue with this? Well, it depends upon what you think “peace” is and what “justice” is. We know in an abstract way what these things are, but far too often, activist groups associate these terms with their causes, believing that this is nothing but “justice.”

    Look for hidden agendas whenever you see these words…

  6. 6Hickok on Jul 6, 2011 at 1:35 pm:

    To bad justice never applies to the tax payer. I’d like some tax payer street justice please.

  7. 7Bard on Jul 10, 2011 at 10:28 am:

    Leftist jargon — wherever you’re hiding, I will hunt you down and I will eliminate you!

    Teste Da-a-vid cum… SI BYL LA!

  8. 8Shii on Jul 10, 2011 at 10:37 pm:

    “Justice” no longer means an equal enforcement of law; nowadays it’s something like “hatred of strength”.

  9. 9mysterian1729 on Jul 12, 2011 at 8:22 pm:

    To extend what Feynman said, if your justice needs an adjective then maybe it isn’t justice. BTW, your history of the the term “social justice” is not quite correct. The term migrated over from Europe…

  10. 101389AD on Jul 31, 2011 at 5:06 pm:

    This is a great post, btw!

    Liberals distort the language, so as to define the terms of the debate and to make the rest of us fight on their battlefield. See: Why modern liberals are 100% wrong about everything.

  11. 11Tlozuk on Aug 6, 2011 at 11:34 am:

    I was just re-reading a lot of the old stuff about staging scenes in Lebanon and was wondering did HRW ever issue a second response to your refutation of their report?

  12. 12zombie on Aug 9, 2011 at 11:04 am:

    Tlozuk:

    That was so long ago, I don’t even remember!

    I have the feeling that once I won the first round, they realized it was wiser to try to ignore me. Though I could be wrong — maybe they did respond, and I never noticed (having moved on to other things), or maybe I even did notice, but by now have forgotten!

    Sorry. It seems like eons have passed since then.

  13. 13Ronald Lawing on Nov 23, 2013 at 9:54 am:

    Congratulations for posting such a beneficial blog. Your blog isn’t only informative except in addition particularly artistic exceedingly. At hand frequently are enormously link of individuals who can send a letter to not so relaxed articles that productively. Save positive the good script !!

Trackbacks / Pingbacks:

  1. “Food Justice” Coming To New Jersey? | The Political Hat

    Pingback on Dec 12, 2012 at 7:02 pm