<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protest Against Prop. 8 Gay Marriage Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470</link>
	<description>the zombietime blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-108313</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 04:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-108313</guid>
		<description>Why is it when I try to find good reasons by the right to oppose gay marriage the right keeps throwing me reasons why I should oppose them?

Sometimes I just want to give up on conservatism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it when I try to find good reasons by the right to oppose gay marriage the right keeps throwing me reasons why I should oppose them?</p>
<p>Sometimes I just want to give up on conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Rockland</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-101640</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Rockland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-101640</guid>
		<description>No wonder there are so many people on medication.   I would be too if I held the hatred that the people who write these comments do.  I love your captions to the pics.    The pics are of course the best.    I wonder how many of these protestors actually work in the private sector.  I wonder how many of these protestors are receiving monies from the State, Federal, or local governments that they so despise.   I wonder how many of the protestors are receiving social services from the government that they hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder there are so many people on medication.   I would be too if I held the hatred that the people who write these comments do.  I love your captions to the pics.    The pics are of course the best.    I wonder how many of these protestors actually work in the private sector.  I wonder how many of these protestors are receiving monies from the State, Federal, or local governments that they so despise.   I wonder how many of the protestors are receiving social services from the government that they hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy (TRiG)</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-84337</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy (TRiG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-84337</guid>
		<description>Zombie,

I see you didn't post my comment that accused you of being transphobic. Maybe it was the language that put you off. I'll restrain myself this time.

Or maybe you held back my post because I said I hadn't read the full comments thread. Well, I have now. And I'm disappointed.

First: a history lesson. It was social conservatives who made same-sex marriage an issue, by seeking to ban it. Hawaii, I believe. As you say, it wasn't really on the radar before then. I don't see the lack of marriage equality as the worse social injustice in the world; or even in the Western world; or even among gay people in the Western world. In the USA, DOMA and ENDA are probably bigger issues, in terms of the effects on people's lives. But marriage inequality is perhaps the most obvious social wrong, and (theoretically) the easiest to fix. It's discrimination based on blind bigotry, with absolutely no supporting arguments whatsoever. It's just so obvious, so straightforward, that it's frustrating that it's not being fixed immediately. Also, some people cannot afford to wait.

Furthermore, you are describing these as Prop-8 protests. There has been a lot of discussion on gay blogs about why there was such an outpouring of protest after Prop-8 (too late). I think it was just an overboiling of frustration. Of course civil rights have come on in great strides since the days of Harvey Milk, but recently things have been bogging down again, and the rhetoric has been ratcheting up. There is real hate out there (some of it on this blog). In other words, whatever the signs may have said, these protests weren't just about Prop-8, or even mainly about Prop-8. Prop-8 was just the most potent symbol. It shocked many younger gay people out of their political complacency.

Gay people are, of course, a disparate community. We are analogous to the Deaf, more than to the racial minorities. (And Deaf people too have been persecuted and disenfranchised.) We are brought up, usually, by straight parents, we have straight siblings, straight schoolmates and other friends. We are integrated. And, while kids are coming out earlier now, late teens is still quite common, and some come out considerably later. The idea that we should all move away is, of course, ridiculous.

Here in Ireland, I've been to one rally for marriage equality, and have written to the Taoiseach and to the Minister for Justice. (I've had replies, too. Polite ones.)

Unlike you, Zombie, I'm not much of a fan of direct democracy. I think a constitution should have a firm commitment to equality, and should be difficult to change, requiring more than a simple majority. And I think campaign ads based on outright lies and hate-speech should be restricted. The National Organisation for Marriage tell more lies than you'd believe. (Many such lies are documented on Jeremy Hooper's excellent blog Good as You.) The American Constitution does not claim to grant rights, it enumerates them. The rights already exist, and are inalienable. On that premise, it could be argued (morally, if not legally) that the vote for Prop-8 was invalid.

I am not a lawyer. I am certainly not an American lawyer. I don't claim that's a good argument for court, though it may be. I'm just saying it's one way to look at it. The people have spoken, and they were wrong, and they did something they had no right to do. That's how I see it, anyway.

Perhaps you'll publish me this time? I've held off on the insults, though no one else in the thread has bothered to do so.

TRiG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zombie,</p>
<p>I see you didn&#8217;t post my comment that accused you of being transphobic. Maybe it was the language that put you off. I&#8217;ll restrain myself this time.</p>
<p>Or maybe you held back my post because I said I hadn&#8217;t read the full comments thread. Well, I have now. And I&#8217;m disappointed.</p>
<p>First: a history lesson. It was social conservatives who made same-sex marriage an issue, by seeking to ban it. Hawaii, I believe. As you say, it wasn&#8217;t really on the radar before then. I don&#8217;t see the lack of marriage equality as the worse social injustice in the world; or even in the Western world; or even among gay people in the Western world. In the USA, DOMA and ENDA are probably bigger issues, in terms of the effects on people&#8217;s lives. But marriage inequality is perhaps the most obvious social wrong, and (theoretically) the easiest to fix. It&#8217;s discrimination based on blind bigotry, with absolutely no supporting arguments whatsoever. It&#8217;s just so obvious, so straightforward, that it&#8217;s frustrating that it&#8217;s not being fixed immediately. Also, some people cannot afford to wait.</p>
<p>Furthermore, you are describing these as Prop-8 protests. There has been a lot of discussion on gay blogs about why there was such an outpouring of protest after Prop-8 (too late). I think it was just an overboiling of frustration. Of course civil rights have come on in great strides since the days of Harvey Milk, but recently things have been bogging down again, and the rhetoric has been ratcheting up. There is real hate out there (some of it on this blog). In other words, whatever the signs may have said, these protests weren&#8217;t just about Prop-8, or even mainly about Prop-8. Prop-8 was just the most potent symbol. It shocked many younger gay people out of their political complacency.</p>
<p>Gay people are, of course, a disparate community. We are analogous to the Deaf, more than to the racial minorities. (And Deaf people too have been persecuted and disenfranchised.) We are brought up, usually, by straight parents, we have straight siblings, straight schoolmates and other friends. We are integrated. And, while kids are coming out earlier now, late teens is still quite common, and some come out considerably later. The idea that we should all move away is, of course, ridiculous.</p>
<p>Here in Ireland, I&#8217;ve been to one rally for marriage equality, and have written to the Taoiseach and to the Minister for Justice. (I&#8217;ve had replies, too. Polite ones.)</p>
<p>Unlike you, Zombie, I&#8217;m not much of a fan of direct democracy. I think a constitution should have a firm commitment to equality, and should be difficult to change, requiring more than a simple majority. And I think campaign ads based on outright lies and hate-speech should be restricted. The National Organisation for Marriage tell more lies than you&#8217;d believe. (Many such lies are documented on Jeremy Hooper&#8217;s excellent blog Good as You.) The American Constitution does not claim to grant rights, it enumerates them. The rights already exist, and are inalienable. On that premise, it could be argued (morally, if not legally) that the vote for Prop-8 was invalid.</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer. I am certainly not an American lawyer. I don&#8217;t claim that&#8217;s a good argument for court, though it may be. I&#8217;m just saying it&#8217;s one way to look at it. The people have spoken, and they were wrong, and they did something they had no right to do. That&#8217;s how I see it, anyway.</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;ll publish me this time? I&#8217;ve held off on the insults, though no one else in the thread has bothered to do so.</p>
<p>TRiG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zombie</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-74912</link>
		<dc:creator>zombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-74912</guid>
		<description>119 Anonymous:

Oh, so America is a backward nation because not all states allow gay marriage?

Interesting.

And exactly how many gay marriages have there been in England?

Hold on, I'm counting...counting...counting...oh, here's the total: ZERO.

How in the world can you stand there in a country that does not allow gay marriages (the UK) and fling accusations of backwardness and evil at a country that allows more gay marriages than your own?

And no, the "civil partnerships" allowed in the UK are no different that the "domestic partnerships" that already exist in California and most other states. On the issue of gay marriage the UK is far more backward than the US.

Get back to me when the UK legalizes gay marriage. Until then, you have absolutely no leg to stand on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>119 Anonymous:</p>
<p>Oh, so America is a backward nation because not all states allow gay marriage?</p>
<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>And exactly how many gay marriages have there been in England?</p>
<p>Hold on, I&#8217;m counting&#8230;counting&#8230;counting&#8230;oh, here&#8217;s the total: ZERO.</p>
<p>How in the world can you stand there in a country that does not allow gay marriages (the UK) and fling accusations of backwardness and evil at a country that allows more gay marriages than your own?</p>
<p>And no, the &#8220;civil partnerships&#8221; allowed in the UK are no different that the &#8220;domestic partnerships&#8221; that already exist in California and most other states. On the issue of gay marriage the UK is far more backward than the US.</p>
<p>Get back to me when the UK legalizes gay marriage. Until then, you have absolutely no leg to stand on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloe</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-74907</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-74907</guid>
		<description>106 John      “I found it ironic in the video that the gays were yelling “You don’t know what fucking love is. Get the fuck out of here” at the Hispanic cyclist. Seething with hatred for him. Hypocrate”
I agree that it is ironic how a group of people so adamant to gain rights to marry (a vow of love) can be so hateful to those who deny them their hopes and dreams. The signs displayed at the protest were at times distasteful, and the lack of effort to appeal to a wider audience was stunning. However, the gay community as a whole cannot be put under this scrutiny, and even these men and women who are so blatantly accusatory towards others, are not like this in everyday life. Some of these same men and women are part of our workforce, they are part of this country as much as any heterosexual man or woman. For those who do feel hateful, how can you blame them for the expression of their anger? Gay people are human, they are allowed to feel as distasteful of their opponents as you are to feel of them for their anger. We do not expect people who have lived through a war to forgive the invaders who scarred their lives. So why do we expect those who have lived through hate crimes, constant degrading comments, and possibly a hateful upbringing, to ignore comments made that bring the traumas of their lives under scrutiny. 
Zombie you said in #97-
They’re believers, like it or not, understand it or not. You’ll just have to live with that. 

It is amusing how this side of the argument can be used in the opposite context. Gay people, although not "believers" could replace the term with "gay" and have the same affect on some heterosexuals as this quote had on me. Homosexuals have been around as long as "believers" of all sorts, and people will just have to accept that. Both sides will have to learn how to live with each other. 
Why should one group of people be kept down because they have less power than the other? Because that's life as and "you'll just have to live with that." However this same thought pattern can be applied to why someone can make a hypocritical argument at a symbol of his struggle, because it is life and it is logical that one would be angry and want change, just as it is logical that the majority wins. 
How can we judge so many people, of both sides, on logical actions we make based on experiences and life. Believers and gays, we are all the same, stubborn and &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt;eous. (Get it… pun? Okay I know I’m not a comedian)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>106 John      “I found it ironic in the video that the gays were yelling “You don’t know what fucking love is. Get the fuck out of here” at the Hispanic cyclist. Seething with hatred for him. Hypocrate”<br />
I agree that it is ironic how a group of people so adamant to gain rights to marry (a vow of love) can be so hateful to those who deny them their hopes and dreams. The signs displayed at the protest were at times distasteful, and the lack of effort to appeal to a wider audience was stunning. However, the gay community as a whole cannot be put under this scrutiny, and even these men and women who are so blatantly accusatory towards others, are not like this in everyday life. Some of these same men and women are part of our workforce, they are part of this country as much as any heterosexual man or woman. For those who do feel hateful, how can you blame them for the expression of their anger? Gay people are human, they are allowed to feel as distasteful of their opponents as you are to feel of them for their anger. We do not expect people who have lived through a war to forgive the invaders who scarred their lives. So why do we expect those who have lived through hate crimes, constant degrading comments, and possibly a hateful upbringing, to ignore comments made that bring the traumas of their lives under scrutiny.<br />
Zombie you said in #97-<br />
They’re believers, like it or not, understand it or not. You’ll just have to live with that. </p>
<p>It is amusing how this side of the argument can be used in the opposite context. Gay people, although not &#8220;believers&#8221; could replace the term with &#8220;gay&#8221; and have the same affect on some heterosexuals as this quote had on me. Homosexuals have been around as long as &#8220;believers&#8221; of all sorts, and people will just have to accept that. Both sides will have to learn how to live with each other.<br />
Why should one group of people be kept down because they have less power than the other? Because that&#8217;s life as and &#8220;you&#8217;ll just have to live with that.&#8221; However this same thought pattern can be applied to why someone can make a hypocritical argument at a symbol of his struggle, because it is life and it is logical that one would be angry and want change, just as it is logical that the majority wins.<br />
How can we judge so many people, of both sides, on logical actions we make based on experiences and life. Believers and gays, we are all the same, stubborn and <em>right</em>eous. (Get it… pun? Okay I know I’m not a comedian)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stinkybarbie</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-68378</link>
		<dc:creator>stinkybarbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-68378</guid>
		<description>Lots of great posts here.  Anon from England, you are a coward and a hypocrit.  There is a reason my ancestors left your country, they were tired of you peoples borish horseshit.  Stay on your side of the puddle.  Guess we'll be friends when the Huns are kicking your limey arses again.... have some spotted dick for me you tosser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of great posts here.  Anon from England, you are a coward and a hypocrit.  There is a reason my ancestors left your country, they were tired of you peoples borish horseshit.  Stay on your side of the puddle.  Guess we&#8217;ll be friends when the Huns are kicking your limey arses again&#8230;. have some spotted dick for me you tosser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-62725</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-62725</guid>
		<description>I am from England. 

I have many many close friends who are American.

Americans are regularly considered in the UK to be arrogant, ill-educated and ill-informed. I hate that.

Thank you for all you supporters of proposition 8 for confirming to my countrymen that you are in fact all of those things. Thank you for allowing us to consider you a backward nation. I hate that it is even a consideration. I HATE anti-American feeling, then I come across your website and read the comments from retards who haven't realised the world has progressed a little in the last 50 years. 

There's a reason you are hated globally. The comments on this website are the reason. 

Grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am from England. </p>
<p>I have many many close friends who are American.</p>
<p>Americans are regularly considered in the UK to be arrogant, ill-educated and ill-informed. I hate that.</p>
<p>Thank you for all you supporters of proposition 8 for confirming to my countrymen that you are in fact all of those things. Thank you for allowing us to consider you a backward nation. I hate that it is even a consideration. I HATE anti-American feeling, then I come across your website and read the comments from retards who haven&#8217;t realised the world has progressed a little in the last 50 years. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason you are hated globally. The comments on this website are the reason. </p>
<p>Grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: advertisingray</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-59967</link>
		<dc:creator>advertisingray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-59967</guid>
		<description>If only the cigarette smokers had the PR machinery of the sodomizers. Cigarette smokers would be allowed to smoke and preach from the pulpit simultaneously. They would be able to smoke anywhere and at anytime. They could distribute them to our school children beginning in Kindergarten. Class lessons would be taught on the virtue of lighting up. Our news anchors would extol the virtues of smoking while smoking and dispensing the news. Our Hollywood icons would advocate smoking in order to expand their appeal and box office receipts. Our teen agers would be more tolerant of the smoking lifestyle. Tobacco would be the new black. Smoking would not be deemed deviant behavior by The American Psychological Association. Tolerance toward cigars, snuff and pipes would increase. We would even be debating an additional amendment to the U.S. Constitution to codify the right to smoke. We could pass hate-crime laws to doubly punish the evil tobaccophobes. The Sunday newsmagazines would run pop quizzes in which  incorrect answers would label you as a heinous non-smoker. Any Miss America contestant who doesn't bow at the altar of tobacco would be vilified and removed from competition. The tabloid newspapers could run outing columns in which prominant athletes who smoke are outed. Most importantly, our government would subsidize the tobacco industry so that a single pack of cigarettes will not cost more than lifetime HIV treatments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only the cigarette smokers had the PR machinery of the sodomizers. Cigarette smokers would be allowed to smoke and preach from the pulpit simultaneously. They would be able to smoke anywhere and at anytime. They could distribute them to our school children beginning in Kindergarten. Class lessons would be taught on the virtue of lighting up. Our news anchors would extol the virtues of smoking while smoking and dispensing the news. Our Hollywood icons would advocate smoking in order to expand their appeal and box office receipts. Our teen agers would be more tolerant of the smoking lifestyle. Tobacco would be the new black. Smoking would not be deemed deviant behavior by The American Psychological Association. Tolerance toward cigars, snuff and pipes would increase. We would even be debating an additional amendment to the U.S. Constitution to codify the right to smoke. We could pass hate-crime laws to doubly punish the evil tobaccophobes. The Sunday newsmagazines would run pop quizzes in which  incorrect answers would label you as a heinous non-smoker. Any Miss America contestant who doesn&#8217;t bow at the altar of tobacco would be vilified and removed from competition. The tabloid newspapers could run outing columns in which prominant athletes who smoke are outed. Most importantly, our government would subsidize the tobacco industry so that a single pack of cigarettes will not cost more than lifetime HIV treatments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b1jetmech</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-57431</link>
		<dc:creator>b1jetmech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-57431</guid>
		<description>Zombie,

Thanks for the education into the matter. Don't agree with everything you say but that's fine...I don't agree with my mother on everything.

One of the reasons I'm For Prop 8 is Homosexuals will join forces with the most radical leftists to get what they want. If that means they would vote for Joseph Stalin who would promise them gay marriage by all means they will do so. There are other reasons but will elaborate later.

I have to chime in with some useless information. As far as Ken posting from China. The Chinese are the number one hackers against the US. What they do is hack into a computer in Canada and go through it to the US. When we trace it it will show Canada as the place of origin. But digging further, it can be traced back to China. So I wouldn't know where Ken is really...but who cares.

Ken is self absorbed because he graduated from one of China's indoctrination centers so has the best of both worlds of supporting Homosexual marriage and Communism so congrats to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zombie,</p>
<p>Thanks for the education into the matter. Don&#8217;t agree with everything you say but that&#8217;s fine&#8230;I don&#8217;t agree with my mother on everything.</p>
<p>One of the reasons I&#8217;m For Prop 8 is Homosexuals will join forces with the most radical leftists to get what they want. If that means they would vote for Joseph Stalin who would promise them gay marriage by all means they will do so. There are other reasons but will elaborate later.</p>
<p>I have to chime in with some useless information. As far as Ken posting from China. The Chinese are the number one hackers against the US. What they do is hack into a computer in Canada and go through it to the US. When we trace it it will show Canada as the place of origin. But digging further, it can be traced back to China. So I wouldn&#8217;t know where Ken is really&#8230;but who cares.</p>
<p>Ken is self absorbed because he graduated from one of China&#8217;s indoctrination centers so has the best of both worlds of supporting Homosexual marriage and Communism so congrats to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcreight13</title>
		<link>http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-56320</link>
		<dc:creator>jcreight13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=470#comment-56320</guid>
		<description>The intriguing yet distirbing conundrum of the liberal/progressive movement is promoting "diversity" except when it includes diversity of opinion or intellect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intriguing yet distirbing conundrum of the liberal/progressive movement is promoting &#8220;diversity&#8221; except when it includes diversity of opinion or intellect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
